Connect with us

Opinion

Kano 2027: Unity, Continuity and the Yusuf Factor

Published

on

 

 

Lamara Garba

 

Kano is beginning to speak with a more united political voice. As the 2027 general elections draw closer, politicians who once occupied different political camps are increasingly converging under the banner of the All Progressives Congress (APC), creating a political landscape that is noticeably different from the familiar pattern of fierce rivalry and fragmentation. 

 

The arrival of prominent politicians, former elected officials, party leaders and thousands of supporters from different political backgrounds is therefore more than a routine exercise in political realignment; it signals an emerging consensus around stability, continuity and the search for a broader political platform capable of carrying Kano into its next chapter.

 

The significance of this development extends beyond the movement of politicians from one party or political group to another. It represents an emerging political convergence and a growing search for unity, stability and a shared vision for Kano. The entry of prominent political figures on Saturday, 5th September 2026, including Senator Rufa’i Sani Hanga and former Governor Kabiru Ibrahim Gaya, alongside other experienced politicians and stakeholders, has added a new dimension to the political equation in the state. Their movement into the APC, together with the reported influx of thousands of new members, suggests that Kano’s political landscape is undergoing a significant realignment as the state prepares for another crucial electoral contest.

 

Politics is ultimately a game of confidence. Political platforms may change and alliances may evolve, but people are generally drawn towards where they see hope, opportunity and the prospect of a better future. That is why the growing political convergence around Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf and the APC deserves attention. The movement of politicians into the APC is undoubtedly significant, but the more important question is why the political landscape is changing.

 

One possible explanation lies in the growing public acceptance of Governor Yusuf and the direction of his administration, particularly its emphasis on people-centred policies, human capital development and programmes intended to improve the lives and prospects of citizens.

 

At the heart of this approach is a simple but profound philosophy: government must ultimately be about the people. The greatest political strength of any leader does not lie only in the number of influential personalities standing beside him, but in the confidence of ordinary citizens who believe that government understands their needs and aspirations. People do not live on political slogans; they live with the consequences of government policies. Parents worry about the education and future of their children, young people seek opportunities to develop their potential, families require access to essential services, while communities expect development that they can see and experience. It is in this relationship between government and the people that Governor Yusuf has sought to build the political foundation of his administration.

 

The emphasis on people-centred policies and human capital development reflects an understanding that the most valuable resource of Kano State is not merely what lies beneath its soil or the structures that stand above it, but its people. A government that invests in people is investing in the future; a society that educates its children is preparing tomorrow’s leaders; a government that creates opportunities for young people is building hope; and leadership that places human development at the centre of governance is laying a foundation that can outlive any political administration. This is why the question of continuity has become increasingly important as Kano moves towards 2027.

 

Development is not an event; it is a process. No meaningful policy achieves its full potential overnight. Educational investments require time, human capital programmes require consistency, while development plans need stability of leadership and the patience of the people. The argument for the continuity of Governor Yusuf’s administration must therefore be viewed beyond the narrow prism of political ambition. It is about allowing policies to mature, consolidating development programmes, deepening investments in the people and giving a government that has established a development direction the opportunity to take that journey further. This provides a philosophical foundation upon which the case for a second term can be made.

 

There is also a broader political significance in the growing convergence of leaders and supporters under the APC. For years, Kano politics has been characterised by intense competition, and political rivalry is not necessarily a bad thing because democracy thrives on choices, competing ideas and different visions for society. However, competition must never become a permanent source of division. The people of Kano deserve an election season that inspires confidence rather than fear, and they deserve political leaders who understand that the collective interest of the state is greater than personal disagreements. The growing unity therefore deserves to be encouraged because the coming together of political leaders with different histories and backgrounds provides an opportunity for Kano to reduce tension and strengthen democratic stability as 2027 approaches.

 

Kano is too politically important to remain trapped in endless divisions. Its population, commercial influence and political consciousness make it impossible to ignore, and whatever happens politically in Kano often carries consequences beyond its borders. The state therefore requires leadership capable of uniting rather than dividing, inspiring confidence rather than uncertainty, and placing development above partisan bitterness. Governor Yusuf’s growing political acceptance and the expanding support for the APC offer an opportunity to build such a broad political consensus, although political unity must always be accompanied by responsibility.

 

The arrival of influential politicians and thousands of new supporters should not create complacency. Rather, it should strengthen the determination of the government and the party to deliver more meaningful results. The true measure of political popularity is not the size of the crowd at a rally, but the confidence that remains in the hearts of the people after the political excitement has faded. That confidence must be earned continuously through performance, inclusive governance, accountability and policies that address the real needs of citizens. Governor Yusuf and the APC therefore have an opportunity to present the people of Kano with a compelling argument as 2027 approaches, but that argument should not rest merely on promises. It must rest on performance, policies and the visible impact of governance.

 

The people will ask what has been achieved, what has changed, what opportunities have been created and what remains to be done. They will ultimately decide whether the journey deserves to continue, and that is the essence of democracy. Yet the growing political convergence in Kano has already provided an important indication of the changing mood. The decision of prominent political figures and thousands of their supporters to come together under one broad political platform reflects a growing belief that unity and continuity may offer Kano a stronger path towards the future.

 

The coming together of these political forces has also helped to reduce some of the anxieties traditionally associated with election seasons. Where leaders are willing to dialogue, cooperate and place the larger interest of society above personal differences, the political atmosphere becomes more stable. For Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, however, the greatest task remains governance. Political support can be won, but public confidence must be sustained; a leader must continue to listen to the people, a government must continue to respond to their needs, and development must continue to reach beyond political speeches into the daily lives of citizens.

 

The strongest argument for a second term will therefore be found not merely in the number of politicians who have joined the APC, but in the number of people whose lives have been touched by the policies and programmes of the administration. That is the true meaning of people-centred governance. As Kano moves towards 2027, the state appears to be entering a new political phase in which the convergence of experienced politicians, the growing support for the APC and the increasing confidence in Governor Yusuf have created a momentum that cannot easily be ignored. But the most important political force remains the people, and they will have the final word.

 

If the administration continues to deepen its people-centred policies, strengthen human capital development, sustain public confidence and promote political inclusion, then the argument for continuity will become even stronger. The politicians may have found a common umbrella, but the ultimate purpose of politics must remain the welfare of the people. If the emerging unity in Kano is sustained and translated into purposeful governance, then the road to 2027 may become more than a contest for political power; it may become a collective decision about the future Kano wants to build and the leadership it believes should continue that journey.

 

For Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf and the APC, unity has created an opportunity, but performance must justify it. The political realignment may be gathering momentum, but the enduring question will remain whether that momentum can be converted into better governance, greater opportunity and a more united Kano. In the final analysis, it is the people who will decide, and their verdict will be shaped not simply by political alliances, but by their lived experience of governance.

 

Lamara Garba, a veteran journalist, writes from Kano.

 

Opinion

Sheikh Masussuka’s killing: why sectarian blame must not replace justice

Published

on

 

Imam Murtadha Gusau

 

The killing of Katsina-based Islamic preacher Sheikh Yahaya Ibrahim Masussuka should serve as a warning against the dangers of religious extremism, sectarian hostility and the reckless attribution of blame before investigations are concluded.

 

Sheikh Masussuka was reportedly shot dead alongside his associate, Adamu Abubakar, by gunmen in Dutsin-Ma, Katsina State, on Monday, October 26, 2026. His death has generated tension, with allegations circulating on social media and among religious circles that members of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah, particularly the Salafiyyah and Izalah movements, were responsible.

 

Those allegations have been complicated by an audio statement in which the terrorist group Ansaru reportedly claimed responsibility for the killings. The group was also reported to have cited Masussuka’s religious views, advocacy for interfaith dialogue and condemnation of violent extremism among its grievances against him.

 

These claims must be properly investigated and independently established. However, they underscore an important point: religious disagreements, however intense, must never become a licence for violence, and suspicion must never be mistaken for proof.

 

The danger of collective blame

Masussuka was a controversial religious figure whose Qur’an-centred teachings, including his rejection of the authority of Prophetic Hadith, brought him into theological disagreements with mainstream Islamic scholars.

 

In November 2025, he reportedly petitioned the Katsina State Government over alleged insults and threats from members of the Izalah movement. Such a history of disagreement may explain why some people quickly suspected his religious opponents after his killing. It does not, however, establish their responsibility for the crime.

 

In a society where religious identity can easily become a source of division, the temptation to blame an entire movement for the actions of individuals is dangerous. It can inflame tensions, provoke retaliation and endanger innocent people.

 

No religious group should be held collectively responsible for a crime without credible evidence. Equally, no individual or organisation should be shielded from investigation merely because of its religious affiliation or public standing.

 

The appropriate response to the killing is a thorough, impartial investigation that identifies the perpetrators, establishes their motives and brings those found culpable to justice.

 

The Katsina State Police Command and other relevant authorities must be allowed to carry out their responsibilities without pressure from partisan interests or religious factions. Members of the public, meanwhile, should resist the temptation to spread unverified allegations or mobilise others against people they suspect.

 

Justice cannot be secured through rumours, online accusations or reprisals. It requires evidence, due process and the courage to accept the outcome of a credible investigation.

 

Islam’s position on the sanctity of life

As a Muslim, I consider the protection of innocent life a fundamental obligation. The deliberate killing of an innocent person is a grave offence, and no interpretation of religion should be used to justify murder, intimidation or acts of terror.

 

Allah says in the Qur’an:

 

“Whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption done in the land—it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one—it is as if he had saved mankind entirely.” (Qur’an 5:32)

 

This teaching places an enormous moral responsibility on every believer. Human life cannot be treated as disposable simply because someone holds a different opinion, belongs to another religious group or challenges a particular interpretation of scripture.

 

The Qur’an also instructs Muslims to invite people to the way of their Lord with wisdom and good counsel, and to engage them in the best possible manner (Qur’an 16:125).

 

This principle is particularly important when religious differences become contentious. Disagreement should be addressed through scholarship, dialogue and reasoned argument—not threats, intimidation or violence.

 

Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah, like other Muslim communities, should be judged by the conduct of its adherents and the teachings they uphold, rather than by allegations that have not been established. Those who identify with the Sunnah must demonstrate through their conduct that their commitment to the faith is inseparable from justice, mercy and respect for human life.

 

At the same time, the rejection of terrorism must be universal. Violence does not become acceptable because its perpetrators claim to defend a religious cause, and no group can acquire immunity from scrutiny by invoking Islam.

 

Knowledge must defeat extremism

One of the most effective ways of confronting religious extremism is to promote sound Islamic scholarship and responsible religious leadership.

 

The history of Islam offers examples of scholars who confronted dangerous interpretations through knowledge and dialogue. Abdullah ibn Abbas, a Companion of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), is widely remembered in Islamic tradition for engaging the Khawarij, an early extremist group, in theological argument and challenging their interpretations of religious texts.

 

The lesson is that mistaken beliefs should be confronted with evidence, patience and sound scholarship. Violence against people suspected of holding erroneous views only deepens division and makes peaceful engagement more difficult.

 

Religious leaders therefore have a special responsibility to ensure that their sermons, teachings and public statements do not encourage hatred or legitimise harm against others. They must distinguish between correcting an idea and attacking the dignity or safety of the person who holds it.

 

This responsibility extends to social media, where provocative messages and unverified allegations can spread rapidly. Religious disputes that might otherwise remain confined to scholarly discussions can become public confrontations when users circulate inflammatory claims without checking their accuracy.

 

Muslims should refuse to participate in online campaigns that dehumanise opponents, encourage collective punishment or portray entire communities as enemies. The pursuit of truth requires intellectual honesty, while the defence of religion requires good character.

 

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is reported to have said that a Muslim is one from whose tongue and hand other people are safe. This teaching offers a practical standard by which believers should assess their conduct.

 

If our words expose innocent people to threats, or our actions endanger their lives, we must examine whether we are truly reflecting the values we profess.

 

Mercy is not weakness

The distinction between religious conviction and religious intolerance must be clearly understood. A person can hold firmly to a theological position without insulting, threatening or persecuting those who disagree.

 

Indeed, mercy does not require Muslims to abandon their beliefs. It requires them to uphold those beliefs without violating the rights of others.

 

The Prophet’s conduct provides a model of restraint and compassion. In a well-known account in Sahih al-Bukhari, a Bedouin urinated in the Prophet’s Mosque, prompting some Companions to react angrily. The Prophet instructed them to leave the man alone and have the affected area cleaned, explaining that people had been sent to make matters easier, not harder.

 

The lesson is not that wrongdoing should be ignored. Rather, correction should be proportionate, informed and directed towards addressing the problem instead of humiliating or destroying the person responsible.

 

This approach is relevant to contemporary religious disagreements. A person who expresses a controversial interpretation of Islam should be answered with knowledge and appropriate dialogue. Where conduct violates the law, the authorities should respond through lawful procedures. Neither theological disagreement nor public anger justifies private punishment.

 

Similarly, allegations of blasphemy, disbelief or deviation must not be treated as permission for individuals to take the law into their own hands. Accusations of this nature can have devastating consequences and must never become instruments for settling personal scores or advancing sectarian interests.

 

A responsibility shared by leaders and citizens

The killing of Sheikh Masussuka demands more than condemnation. It calls for a collective commitment to prevent further violence.

 

The police must investigate the killings professionally and pursue those responsible. Religious leaders must calm their followers and reject attempts to exploit the tragedy. Political and community leaders must discourage inflammatory rhetoric, while media organisations and social media users must verify information before publishing or sharing it.

 

The government should also pay attention to the conditions that allow extremist groups to recruit, intimidate communities and spread violent ideologies. Effective security measures must be accompanied by credible religious education, community engagement and opportunities for young people to seek guidance from knowledgeable and responsible scholars.

 

Above all, the authorities must ensure that the pursuit of justice does not become a pretext for harassment or reprisals against innocent people.

 

The killing of one person must not lead to the persecution of another. Nor should the grief of a victim’s family be exploited to deepen divisions within the Muslim community.

 

Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah adherents have a responsibility to reject violence committed in the name of Islam and to demonstrate that their commitment to the Sunnah is reflected in patience, compassion and respect for justice. Other religious communities and ideological groups have the same obligation to reject violence and hold their members accountable for wrongdoing.

 

The protection of innocent life is not the exclusive responsibility of one sect. It is a shared moral and civic duty.

 

Justice, not vengeance

The circumstances surrounding Sheikh Masussuka’s death must be established through a credible investigation. If Ansaru’s reported claim of responsibility is substantiated, the group’s involvement must be confronted through lawful security and judicial measures. If evidence implicates any other individuals, they too must answer for their actions.

 

Until then, Nigerians must resist the urge to turn suspicion into certainty or religious disagreement into collective condemnation.

 

The true test of religious commitment is not the intensity with which one denounces opponents, but the willingness to uphold truth and justice even when emotions run high. Faith should encourage self-restraint, protect human dignity and inspire people to seek peaceful solutions to their differences.

 

Nigeria has already paid a heavy price for violence driven by extremism and communal suspicion. The country cannot afford to allow another killing to become a trigger for fresh hostility.

 

Let the death of Sheikh Yahaya Ibrahim Masussuka strengthen, rather than weaken, our resolve to protect innocent lives, promote responsible religious dialogue and ensure that every allegation is tested against evidence.

 

Islam must not be used as a cover for terrorism, and religious disagreement must never become an excuse for murder. The path forward is clear: reject extremism, condemn false accusations, protect the innocent and allow justice to take its course.

 

Imam Murtadha Muhammad Gusau is the Chief Imam of Nagazi-Uvete Jumu’ah Mosque and the late Alhaji Abdur-Rahman Okene’s Mosque, Okene, Kogi State, Nigeria.

 

Continue Reading

Opinion

Malam Ibrahim Mu’azzam: A Teacher of Teachers and a Lifelong Inspiration

Published

on

 

Prof Ibrahim Bello-Kano (IBK)

 

Malam Ibrahim Mu’azzam is arguably the most influential person and university teacher in my academic and intellectual development. Although I studied Sociology rather than Political Science, I audited his courses and attended his lectures throughout my early and later undergraduate years.

 

One of the qualities that distinguished him then, and which he has retained to this day, is his charismatic personality and the natural attraction he exerts on students through his wide-ranging knowledge, teaching expertise and remarkable ability to inspire intellectual curiosity. Students passionate about ideas and critical thinking were always drawn to his approach to introducing complex concepts to an often bewildered classroom.

 

Malam Mu’azzam, as we fondly call him, was a magnet for ideas and a model of critical intellectual engagement. In those days, he probably had one of the largest personal libraries or private studies. Scores of undergraduate and postgraduate students trooped to his home, which he moved to after leaving the university quarters.

 

We marvelled at his extraordinary collection of books spanning numerous disciplines, far beyond his formal academic specialisation and teaching responsibilities. His study contained, and continues to contain, books on a wide range of subjects, including the philosophy of science, theology, education, English, linguistics and, of course, classic and highly acclaimed works in the social sciences, Political Science and Geography.

 

I still remember an incident in 1988 when Malam and I travelled to the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, for an Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) delegates’ conference. I accompanied him to the university bookshop and watched him purchase books across a variety of academic disciplines. That experience inspired me to follow his example by building a collection of books from different fields—a habit I have sustained to this day.

 

Despite his formal retirement after a long career at Bayero University, Kano (BUK), Malam remains intellectually active. He continues to work with us at the Ibrahim Mu’azzam Institute of Philosophy, organised by the Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD).

 

His continued engagement is a remarkable testament to his enduring contributions to teaching, critical scholarship and the advancement of knowledge within and beyond the academic community. Malam Mu’azzam’s influence extends far beyond the classroom, inspiring generations of students and scholars to embrace intellectual curiosity, independent thought and lifelong learning.

Prof Ibrahim Bello-Kano (IBK), teaches at Bayero University, Kano. 

Continue Reading

Opinion

General Elections 2027: Abba Kabir Yusuf traverses the path to victory

Published

on

 

Mustapha Muhammad

 

As the 2027 general elections draw nearer, the signs pointing towards a possible victory for Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf in his bid for a second term as Executive Governor of Kano State are becoming clearer by the day. The road, once fraught with political obstacles, conflicts, and challenges, appears to be clearing rapidly. Victory is increasingly within sight, God willing.

 

The foundation of Governor Yusuf’s political momentum rests on his administration’s performance, astute political manoeuvring, successful consensus-building during party primaries, and proactive reconciliation efforts. By bringing key political figures from Kano’s three senatorial districts—South, North, and Central—under one umbrella, coupled with the perceived decline in the influence of the Kwankwasiyya movement following widespread defections to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Governor Yusuf has positioned himself favourably ahead of the forthcoming election.

 

He stands out among the contenders for the Kano governorship. His political resilience and strategic departure from what he considers the troubled waters of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) demonstrate his ability to navigate complex political challenges in pursuit of victory.

 

Below are some of the key factors driving Governor Yusuf’s political momentum ahead of the 2027 general elections.

 

Transformative Governance and Administrative Scorecard

 

Over the past three years, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf has implemented people-oriented projects and policies aimed at improving the lives of Kano residents across critical sectors.

 

Educational Revitalisation

 

Increased budgetary allocation: Funding for education rose from 29.5 per cent in 2024 to 30.5 per cent in 2025 and reached 31.5 per cent in 2026, out of a total state budget exceeding ₦1.47 trillion.

 

Massive recruitment: Nearly 20,000 teachers, including personnel recruited under the Kano State Better Education for All (BESDA) initiative, were employed to address critical teacher shortages in classrooms.

 

Infrastructure upgrades: Nearly 400 schools across the state’s 44 local government areas (LGAs) have undergone complete renovation, alongside ongoing construction projects.

 

Academic excellence: Kano State led national performance rankings in the National Examinations Council (NECO) examinations in 2025 and 2026. In 2026, the state produced 74,413 candidates who obtained at least five credits, including English Language and Mathematics, surpassing Lagos State, with 72,496 candidates, and Oyo State, with 55,543.

 

Healthcare Modernisation and Pension Delivery

 

Primary healthcare overhaul: More than 340 primary healthcare centres across the 44 LGAs have been renovated.

 

Hospital expansion: At least 10 new general hospitals have been constructed in underserved LGAs, while work is ongoing on six additional facilities to ensure that every LGA has a dedicated general hospital.

 

Modern equipment: Health facilities have been equipped with CT scanners, dialysis units, ultrasound machines, and automated laboratory analysers.

 

Settlement of pension arrears: Of the inherited ₦48 billion backlog of pension and gratuity liabilities, the administration has disbursed more than ₦32 billion to retirees.

 

Agricultural Development and Rural Infrastructure

 

Farm mechanisation and subsidies: The state procured 98 tractors and 48 combine harvesters while introducing a 50 per cent fertiliser subsidy programme across all LGAs.

 

Irrigation expansion: The rehabilitation of the Watari Irrigation Scheme expanded irrigation coverage by 1,000 hectares, with the aim of boosting year-round agricultural production.

 

Road networks and urban renewal: Eighteen of the 34 planned five-kilometre rural road projects have been completed, with solar streetlights installed. In addition, 12 of the 24 planned urban renewal road projects, covering approximately 76 kilometres, have been delivered.

 

Bridge reconstruction: The Kubaraci-Kura Bridge was restored, reopening important economic and transportation corridors.

 

Empowerment and Skills Acquisition

 

Social safety nets: Monthly stipends of ₦50,000 are provided to 5,200 women, while grants of ₦150,000 have been distributed to youths across the state.

 

Entrepreneurship: Twenty-six technical and entrepreneurship institutes have been revitalised to provide practical vocational training and equip beneficiaries with relevant skills.

 

Political Realignment and Party Unity

 

Governor Yusuf demonstrated political foresight by defecting to the All Progressives Congress (APC). His decision, in the view of his supporters, was timely and strategically informed by the need to secure his political future.

 

The subsequent defections from the NNPP by members of the Kwankwasiyya movement have, according to this argument, strengthened the case for his political realignment. The move also positioned him and his supporters within a political platform they consider more advantageous ahead of the 2027 elections.

 

Furthermore, as the state’s APC leader, Governor Yusuf successfully managed the consensus process during the party primaries, resulting in what supporters described as a “no victor, no vanquished” outcome.

 

His ongoing reconciliation efforts have also helped bring political stakeholders from Kano’s three senatorial districts together, strengthening the prospect of a united political front ahead of the 2027 polls.

 

With his administration’s reported achievements, political realignment, and reconciliation efforts, Governor Yusuf’s supporters believe he is well positioned to secure a second term in office.

 

No doubt, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, the Executive Governor of Kano State, is traversing the path to victory in the 2027 general elections.

 

Mustapha Muhammad is the Chief Press Secretary to the Executive Governor of Kano State, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf. He writes from Kano. 

Continue Reading

Trending