Connect with us

Opinion

Reminiscence: Working with El-Rufai in the FCT

Published

on

Nasir El Rufai

 

By Dr. Auwalu Anwar

Since his voluntary but spectacular return to the country from Cairo on 12 February 2026 and subsequent incarceration by the agents of Emperor Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the story of Malam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai (NAE) has been narrated differently by many interest groups, including his acquaintances, friends, human rights activists, journalists, lawyers and politicians. However, what I found conspicuously missing in all the narratives that I came across is, an objective analysis of his character as an administrator by someone who worked closely with or under him in any of the three public places he administered, namely: Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE), Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and Kaduna State. For instance, the common remarks about his style of leadership that presented him either as a mere sinner or a revered saint, without making any attempt to go beyond the smokescreen of such moral categorization were both irrelevant and unhelpful for the proper understanding of his essential nature as an administrator or a public servant. 

How did NAE, for instance, conceive, protect or violate the trust given to him when he served as Director General, BPE; Minister of the FCT or Governor of Kaduna State? How did he recruit and relate with his political appointees, who were answerable to him? What was the extent of his distance or interference in running the day-to-day affairs of the MDAs under his jurisdiction; but especially in the implementation of their capital projects? This write-up aims to frankly answer these crucial questions, with particular reference to my experiences working with and under him in the FCT.

I first came across NAE in 1998 when a mutual friend, Malam Bashir Yusuf Ibrahim, invited me to the inaugural meeting of an All-Nigeria Elite Group known as the Abuja Initiative or simply AI, in Abuja. NAE was then working as an economic adviser and member of the Programme Implementation and Monitoring Committee under General Abdulsalami Abubakar. Because of the activities of AI and my relationship with Bashir, our paths continued to cross at that time.

With the formation of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) and the emergence of General Olusegun Obasanjo as President, NAE was appointed Director General of the BPE. I later became Special Adviser (Political) to the Speaker, House of Representatives, the purposeful and selfless Rt. Hon. Ghali Umar Na’Abba in February 2000. When NAE established a steering committee on Competition and Anti-Trust in the BPE, he appointed me as one of the members. It was an influential committee with many respected persons including Alhaji Aliko Dangote, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, Professor Charles Soludo, Madam Oby Ezekwesili, Hajiya Maryam Uwais and Mr. Asue Ighodalo, constituting the membership.

In 2003, on his appointment as Minister of the FCT, NAE met with all categories of staff and audited all the operational organs of the institution. To his dismay, he discovered that civil servants had all the time to lazy around as much as they wanted for two reasons: firstly, they had thirty-five years to stay in the service; they could also live up to sixty years before retirement. As such, most of them had no motivation for initiative, innovation, or even commitment to the responsibilities for which they were employed.

To change the trajectory, he thought of creating mandate secretariats, which would operate like state ministries and appoint secretaries, who would serve as commissioners. He compiled all his findings, the audited reports of all the sectors and his vision for a way forward into a comprehensive document. He shared copies of the documents with Bashir, Asue and my humble self to study for a week, with the request that we should all think of suitable individuals who would be invited to assist him in running the new structure.

A week later, we met him to discuss the document. He asked whether we did find capable people to operate the new structure? I nominated one of our mutual friends to be invited to manage the Education Secretariat. He explained that he had me in mind for that sector if I had no objection. I responded that I would prefer to help him in any capacity in the Area Councils in order to handle the political aspect of his job.

NAE then and now, has been anything but a consummate politician. His two tenures as one of the best ever governors in Kaduna State and current status as one of the national leaders of the ADC in Nigeria have not significantly altered his apolitical DNA. He is seen as too crude and impatient to strictly adhere to the conventional diplomatic hypocrisy, or should I say ethical due process, constituting the foundations of professional politics in Nigeria. In other words, he is regarded more as a novice or a misfit among the practitioners of professional politics across the country.

NAE proposed to appoint Asue as Executive Secretary of the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA), but he politely rejected the offer on the excuse that their newly established Chamber was in its embryonic stage and needed his full-time participation in its management to take off properly.

He also proposed to appoint Bashir to serve as Secretary for Transportation but the latter indicated his preference to stay at the background as an unofficial adviser. Of course, Bashir was Special Assistant to the President on Conflict Resolution working directly in the presidency at the time.

The five mandate secretariats created by NAE were: Agriculture & Rural Development; Education; Health & Human Services; Social Development and Transportation. He refused to invite many people who either lobbied him or on whose behalf he was lobbied for any kind of appointment in the FCT. However, he strongly lobbied individuals whom he believed would help him achieve his set objectives to kindly agree to be appointed as secretaries.

For instance, I witnessed his conversation with one of the ladies he invited to be appointed. She strongly complained to him that her current salary was much more than what she would be earning by serving as secretary in the FCT. He ultimately convinced her that she would serve the nation at a higher level even if her renumeration would be lower in the FCT. She took up the appointment anyway.

I reminded NAE of Rt. Hon. Nnaemeka Maduagwu, one of the members of AI, who was a former Speaker in Imo State and suggested that we should invite him to manage the Transportation Secretariat. This was after he had informed us that he had some people in mind for the remaining three secretariats. He mandated me to contact Emeka and convince him to come on board. In fairness to NAE, since he was appointed Minister, he had put members of AI on notice that he would invite some of us to make sacrifice by working in the FCT.

When I contacted Emeka in his Law Office in Garki, Abuja and informed him that the Minister wanted to work with some of us whether he would be interested; he responded by saying, “It depends on the kind of assignment he has in mind for me.” At that point, I explained the assignment to him and he became excited having once chaired House Committee on Transportation in Imo. I collected his CV and he was subsequently appointed Secretary for Transportation.

Ms. Bolanle Onagoruwa was the Secretary for Social Development; Hajiya Amina Bala Zakari was the Secretary for Health & Human Services; while Alhaji Waziri Ahmadu served as Secretary for Agriculture & Rural Development. All those engaged as secretaries were first appointed special assistants to the president and then posted to their respective secretariats in the FCT.

I served as Secretary for Education from April 2004 to February 2006. I had seven directorates under my watch, namely: Agency for Mass Education; FCT College of Education, Zuba; Finance and Administration; Education Resource Centre; Department of Policy and Implementation; Secondary Education Board and Universal Basic Education Board. In the Education Secretariat, we were always engaged with issues of procurement and supplies. This was because, unlike in other sectors, the dividing line between capital and recurrent expenditures in the delivery of our services was, somewhat, very slim. For instance, the purchase of instructional materials and teaching aids, the printing of school records, the provision of school feeding and sports materials, and the continuous activities of the inspectorate department did sometimes overlap between capital and recurrent in their budgetary classification and allocations.

Undoubtedly, for the twenty months I served as education secretary, there was not a single day when NAE introduced any company or anyone to be awarded contract of any kind, whatsoever. He had also never indicated interest in anything other than the genuine development of the sector by following best practices.

When the Universal Basic Education policy became operational, the law stipulated that no public school would charge a dime for its services and all the needed facilities in such institutions would be provided by the government. At that time, NAE’s wife and First Lady of the FCT, Hajiya Hadiza El-Rufai, was running an NGO school belonging to the FCT Orphanage in which some token fees were paid by the pupils. When I called the Minister’s attention and suggested that we either take over the school and provide all its needs or totally withdraw our teachers from the institution. He instructed that we take over the school immediately. Nevertheless, I also went to Hadiza and discussed the issue with her and she surrendered the school in compliance with the extant rules.

I was redeployed to the Agriculture & Rural Development Secretariat in February 2006 and I stayed there till December. ARD was not as busy or as wide as the Education Secretariat. However, there were two incidents that further revealed the essential character of NAE to me as his subordinate. Not long after I assumed duty, there was a request to buy fish food from the staff in charge of the fish pond in the Minister’s house, which I approved.

A few weeks later, another request was made for the same purpose. By some instincts, I suspected mischief in the submission. So, I requested for an expert in fisheries from the federal Ministry of Agriculture to come and assess the actual requirements of the fish pond in the Minister’s residence. After the exercise, the result indicated that, what was approved in the first instance could last up to six months under normal circumstances. The person in charge of the fish pond was made to explain and refund the amount he stole in the previous submission. He was also warned and redeployed elsewhere. Unknown to me, it was considered a taboo in the past to query any submission made from the Minister’s house; and that was what emboldened staff who were privileged to work there, in any capacity, to misbehave and get away with it.

In the year 2006, we bought fertilizer worth Eight-Hundred-Million Naira (N800,000,000) without NAE tempering with or directing the process to favour particular individuals for pecuniary interest. When I discussed what was obtained in the FCT, on the procurement and sale of fertilizer with some of my colleagues, State Commissioners for Agriculture, during our Annual General Meeting, it sounded to them as if I was speaking Mandarin. Many of them confessed to me that, as commissioners, they were only allowed to sign documents to fulfil procedural rituals but were not in any way involved in the implementation of the budgetary allocations of their ministries. That was a preserve of Their Excellencies, the State Governors.

I was transferred to the Health & Human Services Secretariate in December 2006 and I stayed there till July 2007 when another friend of ours, Dr. Aliyu Modibbo Umar was appointed as the new Minister of the FCT. For the short period I was in Health and Human Services Secretariat, another opportunity provided itself which further consolidated my experience of the impeccable integrity of NAE as an excellent administrator and a prudent manager of public resources.

We had an emergency to renovate staff quarters across many hospitals in order to provide accommodation for trainee doctors on their housemanship programme. There wasn’t enough time to strictly follow procurement processes in undertaking the project. Thus, the secretariat was mandated to supervise the work through direct labour. A committee was established under my chairmanship with the Directors of Audit, Finance, Treasury and a representative of the Executive Secretary of the FCDA as members. The required fund to execute the assignment was released to me upfront. I handed it to the Head of Department in my office, Alhaji Mohammed Maikasuwa Mohammed, who put it in a safe in the office and kept all the keys with him. Expectedly, NAE, who did not show any personal interest in the bigger projects that were executed in my previous secretariats, had also not looked our way.

Having narrated my experiences of NAE relating to budgetary allocation and project implementation under his watch, I want to briefly comment on his attitude to his subordinate staff. I have described the dignified manner in which he recruited people to serve as secretaries in the FCT. Because NAE does not have inferiority complex, he always searches for and gets individuals whom he believes are accomplished in their own respects to help him succeed. He once informed me that all the people he appointed as secretaries were capable of serving, effectively, as minister in the FCT. He looks for and supports the emergence of the best possible material in positions of responsibility. He used to be that focused until, probably, recently in choosing his successor in Kaduna State.

At the point of appointing us secretaries, he sat with each of the nominees for a chat during which he discussed his mission and vision for a new FCT. He would also, in turn, ask his nominee what his or her expectations were on the assumption of duty. It was in one of such question-and-answer sessions that one of us raised the issue of the prospect of getting lower renumeration, than what she was currently earning, if she agreed to accept his offer and join the FCT.

When I sat with NAE prior to accepting his offer, I requested three things from him as follows: that he should permit me to always tell him what I felt he should hear not necessarily what he might like to hear; that we should relate with one another as employee and his boss during office hours rather than friends, and; that he should call my attention immediately, if I ever did anything wrong. He conceded to all my requests but emphasized that he would not be as formal as my former boss, Rt. Hon. Ghali Umar Na’Abba, even during office hours.

Honestly, I can always proudly declare that, NAE is an excellent administrator, who stood by his subordinates and supported them no matter what uneasy decisions they took or genuine mistakes they made in the execution of their mandates. It is very ironic, therefore, to know that NAE is today languishing in detention on sundry allegations of abuse of office and corruption and is being investigated under the supervision of Tinubu compliant regulatory agencies.

It should be understood that, nobody is absolving NAE from any allegation of misdeeds but we insist for due process of law to be strictly followed in the investigation. His fundamental rights and human dignity must be respected.

At any rate, I am not denying the possibility of NAE falling short of the expected standards as a human being. However, I doubt the credibility of his traducers who are pointing their uncleanaccusing fingers at him. All the allegations of corruption against NAE, for which he is being persecuted, are not the real reasons for his continued detention but a smokescreen. He is persecuted for being in the opposition. It is NAE today and it may be my turn or your turn tomorrow.

The preponderant perception in Nigeria today is, if truly Tinubu and his agencies are looking for corrupt Nigerians, including former governors and former ministers to investigate and prosecute, they do not have to look far beyond the APC and the Presidency itself. The general opinion is that, in these two institutions, there are more than enough certified criminals, including drug barons, money launderers, bribe takers in both foreign and local currencies with documented evidence publicly available online, who are more deserving to be investigated and prosecuted than him. Members of the criminally-minded APC and functionaries of its disgracefully non performing administration should go after themselves if they genuinely desire to cleanse Nigeria from the economic, political and insecurity misfortunes they inflicted on the country. Period!

However, the best lesson to learn from the travails of NAE is that, in Nigeria today, the greatest tragedy is to support APC and President Tinubu to stay in power beyond 2027. NAE did all he could through fair and foul means to mobilise, galvanise and ensure the victory of APC and candidate Tinubu in both the primary and the general elections in 2023 but only to end up today struggling hard to stay alive with the requisite human dignity as a Nigerian citizen.

The recent shameful charade in the name of APC presidential primaries have set the tone which indicates that the federal government has lost all hopes in Tinubu winning any election in a free and fair contest, not even in Lagos. Apparently, APC and Tinubu are determined to stay in power by perfecting the machinery of rigging. This is why the actual membership of the party, which is lower than three million, was inflated to seven million and presented as eleven million, who were claimed to have voted for him in the recent exercise. Who is fooling who?

No political party can survive in governance through blackmail, intimidation or election malpractice. Whoever wants peace must prepare for war as a pre-condition. No political party has the monopoly of violence. In psychiatric rehabilitation facilities around the world, only two categories of inmates are chained: the haves, who are fermenting trouble; and the have-nots, who are determined to sustain or restore peace and stability at all costs. A word is enough for the wise. Na kwance ba ya tsoron faduwa.

Those persecuting NAE today should be wary of tomorrow. Nigeria is a wonderful country and an unpredictable society. We have once witnessed a curious transition of its leadership from prison to presidency. Who knows, we may still witness a more likely transition from presidency to prison. Only time can tell.

In 1979, following the June 4th Revolution, Flight Lieutenant Jerry John Rawlings and the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council executed three former Ghanaian Heads of State: Generals Akwasi Afrifa (1969–1970); Ignatius Kutu Acheampong (1972–1978); and Frederick Akuffo (1978–1979) by firing squad on charges of corruption and economic treason. What those Generals did to the economy of Ghana is child’s play in comparison to what the current APC administration of Bola Tinubu is doing to the Nigerian economy. Muna gani, muna ji, muna kuma saurare.

Is NAE a perfect administrator without any blemish at all? No! There is no such person walking the earth today. Certainly, he has his strengths and weaknesses as a person. His commitment to excellence in administration is visible in his genuine and selfless search for a team of skillful and talented individuals to handle appropriate portfolios in the management of public institutions. He goes out of his way to do whatever will benefit and promote his subordinates. His loyalty to his friends is never in doubt as attested by many observers. For instance, in 2004, he nominated me to serve on the proposed Economic Monitoring Team of the federal government prior to my appointment as Secretary for Education in the FCT.

In 2008, he came to Nigeria from the UK, purposely to attend the public presentation of my anthology: Gadar Zare at Arewa House in Kaduna. In 2010, I visited him in Dubai to inform him of my interest to participate in the gubernatorial contest of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in Kano. He listened to me attentively and responded by saying, he had been contacted by some people in government and asked to nominate someone to serve as federal commissioner in the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). In addition, he informed me that my name was among the two names he had in mind for the position. He gave me the option to choose between serving in INEC and joining the CPC. Unfortunately, I followed my heart and abandoned the prospect of becoming a national commissioner in INEC. This is the vintage NAE for his friends.

Honestly, I am not in a position to comment truthfully on NAE’s stewardship in Kaduna State. I did not visit him more than seven times in his eight-year tenure as the Governor (2015–2023). This was including my presence at his swearing-in ceremony in 2015 and participation at the Panel Discussion on “Against the Grain: Modern Literature in Hausa,” at Kaduna Book and Art Festival, KABAFEST in July 2017. Notwithstanding, I do not believe that his essential nature as a credible public servant has dramatically changed for worse.

Our friend is still an accused and could be proven innocent of all the allegations and spurious charges labeled against him by his opponents and friendly enemies in power. What we, his friends and family members, require, is an impartial and credible legal process that is capable of delivering justice for the innocent. Not justice for sale to the highest bidder.

Part of NAE’s weakness is his consuming appetite to always stick to the literal meaning and interpretation of laws. He is always ready to apply extant rules and regulations in solving problems, sometimes, without due regard to the attendant moral or social consequences of his actions on the most vulnerable in society. Most of his actions as a Minister or a Governor, which attracted people’s outrage were legally appropriate but could also be culturally, morally, or socially reprehensible.

NAE is, undoubtedly, a competent and intelligent person. He is an achiever and a performerby all standards. He plans well and ahead of time in whatever he does. He does not compromise quality and cost effectiveness in the execution of his projects. Nevertheless, he needs to be schooled in native intelligence and wisdom. He has been accused by many people, including his admirers and well-wishers of putting his words before his thoughts, which sometimes leads him to avoidable embarrassment or falling into dangerous traps. There is a consensus on this.

Finally, I want to use this opportunity to offer my condolences to NAE and other members of the El-Rufai clan for the death of our beloved mother, Hajiya Umma El-Rufai, on 27 March 2026 in Cairo. May Allah forgive her mistakes and reward her good deeds with Janatul Firdaws. May Allah guide those she left behind and give them the fortitude to bear the loss. Amin.

 

Dr Auwalu Anwar is a former lecturer at University of Maiduguri. 

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Zalla-Zalla: Where I Stand – Prof Abdalla Uba Adamu

Published

on

 

Prof Abdalla Uba Adamu

I had previously pledged to close this focus from my repertoire. However, I think there is a need to further clarify one thing to friends and foes concerning my stand on the ongoing raging debate about ethnicity and identity in Hausalandia. I felt it is necessary because of two reasons.

First, some highly considered colleagues have started accusing me of “supporting” one faction, i.e. the Hausa Zalla faction, “despite you being a Fulani.” Second, Farooq Kperogi plans a diaspora debate on the issue and has asked for nominated speakers. My name kept popping up as a panelist. So, let’s clear the air.

I am NOT Hausa Zalla. I am NOT Fulani Zalla. I am NOT Hausa-Fulani Zalla.

I am Abdalla Zalla.

I stand on the side of the truth, no matter where it leans. I am not moved by emotions, but by cold, hard, scientific logic. Hard core evidence of arguments, not speculations or suppositions. Let me share a personal experience to explain how I evolved to where I am now.

My father was a historian. In writing his book, “Confluences and Influences: The Emergence of Kano as a City State,” I was tasked with typing the manuscript from his handwritten notes. In the process, I came across an argument that disturbed me. I printed it, and took to him for a second look. The following approximated the conversation we held.

“Kawu, can you read this passage and confirm its authenticity”

He took it, read it and said,

“What’s the problem?”

“Your argument! You wrote that “the Jihad in Kano was not justified”! Are you sure that’s what you want write?”

“Yes, that’s what I wanted to write. But, still, what’s the problem?”

“But you are Torodbe Fulani, and have been emphasizing that! Are you aware that people who read your book will consider this view sacrilegious?”

“So? That’s their problem not mine. I stand by the passage: the Jihad in Kano was not justified, at least on the basis of religion. Being a Torodbe should not blind me to the truth. And this one of the legacies I want to you to have from me.”

That was my epiphany moment. And I finished typing the manuscript, the book was published and was moderately successful. No one, to the best of my knowledge, challenged at least in print, the Kantoma’s interpretation of the Jihad in Kano. I take the old man’s counsel. Stand with the truth as I interpret and understand if. I perfectly accept different interpretations, but not forceful acceptance.

So far, all the data I have at my disposal points to one incontrovertible fact: Hausa ethnic group existed for centuries. The archeological data supports it, all the way from the Republic of Niger to southern Zaria.

Another cold fact was the recorded arrival of Islam at least in Kano after 1349 and before 1380. Sarki Ali Yaji, who accepted Islam, declared war on those who did not—thus waging the FIRST Jihad in West Africa.

Now, where things get interesting was the view that he and those who accepted Islam retain their Hausa identity. Those who did not accept Islam were declassified from Hausa identity and were classified, by the Muslims, as Maguzawa. But who did this? Certainly not the Hausa themselves.

But they are still Hausa. Being Christians/Animists does not erase their identity. And what about the New Humanists? Regular Muslim Hausa folk who suddenly became atheists or agnostics? Do they also suddenly cease to become Hausa? Thus, when you look closely at this definition of Hausaness being bandied about, it becomes questionable. That a Hausa person is he who is living in Hausalandia, is a Muslim and speaks the Hausa language.

The authority for their Hausaness of the Maguzawa (man, I HATE this label) was Paul Krusius. He was an early 20th-century German ethnographer and scholar who authored one of the foundational academic studies on the Maguzawa whom he described as the non-Muslim, animist Hausa people. His 1915 monograph, (Die Maguzawa) The Maguzawa. Trans by Gisela Seidensticker-Brikay remains a primary historical source for anthropologists and Africanists studying pre-Islamic Hausa culture, religion (Bori and Maguzanci), and the socio-religious dynamics of Northern Nigeria.

Therefore, the Maguzawa, who never actually refer themselves as such, are Hausa, but non-Muslim. Being Hausa refers to shared culture, language (Hausa), history, and heritage, regardless of faith. These attributes don’t disappear simply because they are not Muslims. In Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and many other places, there are millions of Christian Arabs. Does their Christianity erase their Arabness? If not, why should being non-Muslim erase Hausa identity?

The Fulani appeared in Hausalandia in the middle of 15th century. Before their arrival, kingdoms with Muslim structures had existed for centuries. Their proliferation led to intermarriages with the local Hausa women. This is fine and wonderful. However, the products of such marriage do not create a new ethnicity. Thus, the term Hausa-Fulani is primarily a socio-political and regional designator rather than a single homogeneous ethnic group created purely by intermarriage. Such products speak principally the language of Hausalandia. BUT if they decide to become Christians, which part of the hyphenated do they lose?

As such, intermarriage between two ethnic groups does not “cancel” or erase either underlying ethnicity. Ethnicity is a fluid socio-cultural construct based on language, history, geographic lineage, and shared identity—not a biological sum that automatically resets to zero.

So, once more, I am informing all friends, foes and those on the edge, I do not belong to any of the current Zalla movements. I will therefore decline any invitation to be part of any panel discussion on this, with all due apologies to my proposed nomination.

To make it easy for you to understand, I affirm my view that the Hausa ethnic group exists. Maguzawa however they are labeled, are Hausa and are real. That religion is not a factor in determining ethnicity. That you can be in Russia and still be Hausa if you are Hausa and from Hausalandia.

I belong to Gaskiya Zalla. No matter where the needle turns and points.

Abdalla Zalla.

 

Abdalla Uba Adamu is a professor of media and cultural studies at Faculty of Communication, Bayero University, Kano. This was first published on his Facebook account. 

Continue Reading

Opinion

From Grade Level 03 to Director: A 35-Year Journey of Resilience and Service

Published

on

Binta Bala, PhD

Thirty-five years ago, on August 18, 1991, I walked into the Kano State Ministry of Education as a Grade Level 03 Laboratory Attendant, armed with an SSCE certificate, hope and a determination to build a meaningful career.

Today, August 18, 2026, I close that chapter of my life as a substantive Director on Grade Level 16, having served in charge of Persons with Special Needs.

When I look back at the journey, the first words that come to my mind are: Alhamdulillah. Alhamdulillah.

My career was never simply about climbing the civil service ladder. It was a journey marked by dreams, challenges, learning, perseverance and, above all, service to humanity.

I am a woman living with a physical disability and a survivor of polio. I walk with the support of a walking stick, but I have never allowed my physical condition to define who I am or determine what I can achieve.

There were obstacles. There were difficult moments. There were times when the journey demanded more courage than I thought I possessed. But I refused to surrender.

I resisted. I persevered. I kept moving forward.

My walking stick supported my steps, but it was faith, determination, education, courage and resilience that carried me through the larger journey. I chose to concentrate on my abilities rather than my limitations.

That decision changed my life.

After 35 years of service, I retire with a PhD and the privilege of having served as a pioneer Director in charge of Persons with Special Needs under the Ministry of Women Affairs, Children and Persons with Special Needs, Kano State.

For me, this is more than a career achievement. It is a testimony that disability is not inability.

Circumstances may influence the road we travel, but they do not necessarily determine our destination.

My family, my colleagues

I owe a profound debt of gratitude to my family. Thank you for your love, sacrifices, prayers and unwavering support. Thank you for believing in my abilities rather than allowing my disability to become the focus of my identity.

To my colleagues, mentors, friends and well-wishers, I say thank you for making the journey easier and more meaningful.

To every child, woman and person with special needs whose life we have had the privilege of touching, I also say thank you.

You taught me resilience, courage and the true meaning of service. You reminded me every day why inclusion matters.

My greatest reward has never been the positions I attained. It has been the opportunity to serve humanity, promote inclusion, challenge barriers and contribute, in whatever way I could, to improving the lives of others.

A message to persons with disabilities

My journey carries a message for every person who has ever been told, directly or indirectly, that they cannot succeed because of a disability.

Do not give up. Believe in yourself. Keep moving.

Your limitation does not have to become the limit of your destiny.

I know what it means to encounter barriers. I also know what it means to overcome them. The journey may be difficult, but difficulty should never be mistaken for impossibility.

Asking for forgiveness

As I retire from active public service, I wish to sincerely apologise to everyone I may have offended, disappointed or wronged during the course of my career, whether knowingly or unknowingly.

I ask for your forgiveness and understanding.

At the same time, I wholeheartedly forgive everyone who may have wronged, offended or hurt me throughout my career.

I choose to leave the past with a peaceful heart and move into the next chapter with gratitude, forgiveness and goodwill.

The work continues

Retirement from active public service does not mean retirement from the cause of inclusion.

Kano will always have my support and goodwill. My commitment to the protection, inclusion and empowerment of persons with disabilities remains strong.

I therefore appeal to all stakeholders to continue the work of safeguarding and empowering persons with disabilities.

My door remains open. The work must continue.

I hand the baton to you all.

As I close this chapter, I thank Allah, my family, colleagues, mentors, friends and everyone who contributed to this remarkable journey.

I say nagode, nagode.

Alhamdulillah bi ni‘imatihi tatimmus-salihat.

May Allah accept the service, forgive the shortcomings and bless the next chapter.

Thirty-five years of service.
One remarkable journey.
A lifetime of gratitude.

Alhamdulillah.

 

Binta Bala, PhD is a apioneer Director in charge of Persons with Special Needs under the Ministry of Women Affairs, Children and Persons with Special Needs, Kano State.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Kano State Out-of-School Children Survey Report 2026: From Evidence to Impact — A Roadmap For Educational Development

Published

on

 

Dr Auwalu Halilu

 

The Kano State Accountability Forum on Education (K-SAFE) warmly congratulates the Kano State Government, the Ministry of Education and its development partners on the successful completion and presentation of the Kano State Out-of-School Children (OOSC) Household Survey Report 2026.

 

The conduct of this comprehensive survey across the 44 Local Government Areas of Kano State represents an important milestone in the state’s efforts to address one of its most critical educational challenges. The availability of credible, disaggregated and geographically specific data provides Kano State with a stronger evidence base for planning, resource allocation, implementation, monitoring and accountability.

 

The findings demand urgent and sustained action. The survey estimates that 13.34 per cent of children aged 5–18 are out of school, representing approximately 875,593 children across Kano State. It further demonstrates significant disparities among Local Government Areas and identifies multiple barriers relating to poverty and financial constraints, school-related factors, family and cultural circumstances, child-related factors, distance and other structural challenges.

 

Particularly encouraging is the finding that 99.6 per cent of caregivers consider children’s education important or very important. This provides a powerful basis for action. It demonstrates that the challenge is not simply a lack of parental demand for education but is strongly connected to accessibility, affordability, quality, retention and the capacity of the education system to respond to the circumstances of vulnerable children and families.

 

K-SAFE, therefore, calls on the Kano State Government and all education stakeholders to ensure that this important survey does not end as a report but becomes a roadmap for coordinated action to drastically reduce and ultimately eliminate the phenomenon of out-of-school children in Kano State.

 

K-SAFE priorities

 

1. Make basic education truly compulsory and accessible

 

Kano State should strengthen the implementation and enforcement of compulsory basic education while simultaneously addressing the barriers that prevent children from enrolling, attending and completing school. Enforcement should therefore go hand in hand with practical measures that make education accessible, affordable, safe, inclusive and attractive to children and their families.

 

2. Prioritise high-burden LGAs and communities

 

The survey reveals major geographical disparities in OOSC rates. Government interventions should, therefore, be data-driven, with immediate attention given to LGAs, wards and communities with the highest OOSC burden. Resources should be targeted according to identified needs rather than applying uniform interventions across all communities.

 

3. Strengthen SUBEB and the formal basic education system

 

The Kano State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) should be further strengthened to expand access, improve school infrastructure, provide adequate teachers and learning materials, strengthen school-level monitoring and improve the overall quality of basic education.

 

Particular attention should be given to school proximity, teacher availability, retention and transition.

 

4. Expand and strengthen non-formal and alternative education

 

Formal schooling alone cannot adequately respond to the diverse circumstances of all out-of-school children. The Kano State Agency for Mass Education (SAME) should, therefore, receive increased institutional, financial, human and material support to expand flexible and community-based non-formal education programmes, literacy centres, second-chance education and vocational learning opportunities.

 

5. Strengthen Qur’anic, Tsangaya and Islamiyya education integration

 

The relevant board responsible for Qur’anic, Islamiyya and Tsangaya education should be adequately supported to strengthen the integration of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN), basic education, life skills and vocational competencies into appropriate Qur’anic and Tsangaya learning environments.

 

This is particularly important considering the survey’s findings concerning children attending Tsangaya/Almajiri schools and the significant representation of boys among the OOSC population.

 

**6. Promote technical, vocational and employability skills**

 

The Science and Technical Schools Board and other relevant technical and vocational education institutions should be strategically engaged in providing flexible skills-development pathways for older out-of-school children, adolescents and young people.

 

Non-formal education should go beyond basic literacy and numeracy to include vocational skills, entrepreneurship, digital literacy, financial literacy and employability competencies that can support young people in transitioning into productive livelihoods.

 

**7. Address the economic and social barriers to education**

 

The survey demonstrates that the OOSC challenge is multidimensional. Education interventions should, therefore, be linked with social protection, poverty reduction, school feeding where feasible, community mobilisation, child protection, livelihood support and other measures that address the underlying conditions pushing children out of school.

 

**8. Establish a strong OOSC monitoring and accountability framework**

 

The 2026 survey should serve as a baseline for continuous monitoring. Kano State should establish an integrated OOSC tracking mechanism linking the Ministry of Education, SUBEB, SAME, relevant Qur’anic/Tsangaya education authorities, technical education institutions, Local Government structures, traditional institutions, civil society organisations and development partners.

 

### A collective responsibility

 

K-SAFE believes that Kano State now has an important opportunity to move decisively from evidence to policy, from policy to implementation, and from implementation to measurable results.

 

Every child identified by this survey represents more than a statistic. Each represents a future that can be transformed through appropriate education, skills, protection and opportunity.

 

We, therefore, congratulate the Kano State Government and Ministry of Education on this important achievement and call upon all stakeholders—including government agencies, development partners, civil society organisations, traditional and religious leaders, communities, parents and the private sector—to utilise the findings to build a coordinated and adequately resourced response.

 

The data are now available. The barriers are clearer. **The priority must now be action.**

 

Together, Kano State can substantially reduce the number of out-of-school children and progressively ensure that every child has access to quality basic education, alternative learning opportunities and relevant skills for productive citizenship and sustainable livelihoods.

 

Congratulations to the Kano State Government and the Ministry of Education on this important milestone.

 

Dr Auwalu Halilu
Co-Chair (CSOs), Kano State Accountability Forum on Education (K-SAFE).

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trending